CASE STUDY
In the past year, I have co-facilitated approximately fifteen victim/offender conferences for Restorative Justice. The case I am about to relate was, in many ways, the most rewarding.
When
I phoned the victim, a woman whose snowmobile had been stolen, and asked if she
would be willing to participate in a victim pre-conference, there was a long
pause at the other end. When she finally spoke, her response was “no.”
When
I asked why, she spoke of her fear that the offenders might take out their
anger on her family once they were able to identify her as their victim. She spoke of her sense of violation. This was the first new machine she had ever
owned. How dare those punks do this to
her! She spoke of her desire to see
these kids get the punishment they deserve. As she spoke, I listened.
When
she ran out of things to say, I spoke.
I explained that my partner and I would make sure that she had an
opportunity to express her feelings to the offenders in a “safe place.” I talked about the healing that I had
witnessed in the previous conferences that I had facilitated. I concluded by
saying: “But, it is your choice. Think about it. If you change your mind, call me.”
In
the meantime, I called the offenders; three young men in their late teens. I explained how lucky they were to have been
considered for the program. I told them
that the victim was uncertain about her participation but that if she decided
to go to conference these young men would indeed be fortunate. Each boy agreed.
The
victim called me at home the next night.
She asked if I had spoken to the boys.
When I explained that each of the boys seemed to be genuinely remorseful
and that I felt she would feel much better if she were to participate, she
reluctantly agreed.
My
partner, Dan, and I met with the offenders first. One young man spoke of his fear that this crime would ruin his
chances to join the army. Another spoke
of his shame. His father had been
murdered a few years earlier. The young
man had vowed to lead a life that would make his father proud. The third young man, whose idea it was to
take the machine, sat silently as he listened to his friends speak of the crime
into which he had drawn them.
Then
Dan and I conferenced with the victim and her husband. She was articulate, controlled and
determined to see that the boys received the punishment they deserved. She wanted every penny back for the
machine. She wanted each offender to do
150 community service hours. She had
found a friend who needed help on his farm.
They had better be willing to work.
Dan and I listened.
Then
it was time to bring victim and offenders together. The victim spoke first.
She told the boys of her fears for her family. She expressed her sense of violation. She spoke of the anger that she held and her desire for
justice. The offenders sat with eyes
fixed on her. Then, it was their
turn.
The
young man whose father had been murdered, said: “I feel like a murderer
myself.” He went on to explain how he
wanted his life to be better. After his
father had died, he had moved in with his grandmother. Now, the woman who had been so good to him
had to deal with this shame.
As
the victim listened, she began to console the young man. She said:
“You are not a murderer. Your
grandmother has much to be proud of.”
The
young man who was about to enter the army expressed his regret. He told her that he feared this incident
would ruin his life. He used to be
proud to walk down the streets of his town.
He was a good student and a fine athlete. He donated his time coaching young boys. Now he was ashamed to
walk down the street. He knew that
people were talking about him and the things they were saying weren’t nice.
Then,
the third young man spoke. He
said: “It’s my fault. I saw your machine and wanted it. I deserve to be punished. I’ll do whatever you want.”
The
victim, who had feared these young men and had only wanted to see them
punished, spoke again. She looked at me
and said: “I’m afraid 150 hours of
community service is too much to ask.
What do you think, Mary, do you think 75 hours are enough for the two
boys who were accomplices?” The young
man whose father had died said: “It
isn’t enough. I deserve more!” The victim looked at the young man who had
stolen her machine and said: “I don’t
think you are a bad boy but you made a bad choice. I want you to do 150 hours.”
He shook his head and said:
“I’ll do as many hours as you want.”
The
victim asked the boys how they planned to repay her. Each boy presented his plan.
Two boys could pay $50 per month.
The third could pay $100 per month.
As
the conference was coming to an end, the victim asked to speak one more
time. She told the boys that she
thought they were good boys who had done a foolish thing. She wished them well. She told the one young man that his father
would be proud of him. She told the
other boy that she hoped he would be a good soldier. She told them that she felt everyone deserved a second chance and
that this was theirs. Use it well. She said:
“Don’t make me regret my decision!”
As
the boys got up to leave, they walked around the table to the victim. Each boy shook her hand and thanked
her. One young man said: “I’ll try to make you proud.”
As
the young woman left the room, she hugged me.
As I looked at her face, I saw strength where fear had been. I saw compassion where anger had been. I saw empowerment where helplessness had
been. And I said to myself:
“Restorative Justice works!”